Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Master Staff. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Master Staff. Show all posts

Friday, October 18, 2013

Diatonic Chord Progressions: The Baseline of Songwriting

Today we're going to talk about a subject that is very dear to my heart: Chord Progressions and how they relate to songwriting. If you've ever had the dream of becoming a songwriter and given up after little success, there are three things that probably got in your way of becoming famous.

 First of all, as my rhyming dictionary loves to remind me, writing good lyrics takes time and patience to master. Whether you become inspired to write a lyric or it just comes to you in the middle of the night, lyrics need to be refined and practiced in order to be "good". Now "good" is a flexible term because the quality of the lyrics all depends on your audience. Are you writing for the opening of the next concert center in your city, or for personal enjoyment?

This brings us to my second point. Self-confidence is needed in order to be a good writer. The ability to write down a couple lines of lyrics or a measure of melody and be *ok* with what you wrote the next morning is a skill that even I haven't learned yet. The important thing to remember is that no matter what you write down, you need to KEEP IT. Get a journal, take a note on your iPhone, or record it somehow, but don't just throw it away. Keeping ideas around, even if you think it's garbage, will stand as a milemarker to how far you have come as a write, and might even inspire you later on through the words that once didn't.

Finally, and most importantly, beginning song writers don't have a firm concept of chord progressions. To clarify, a chord progression is a series of music chords or notes with the goal of establishing a tonality within a specific key and is based on the succession of root relationships. Big definition right? Let's break this down in todays video, and then apply it to some popular songs so we can understand, as music writers, the fundamentals of chord progressions.

To start with, lets understand that today will only be spent discussing diatonic chord progressions. This means that all the triads and chords we will build our progression from will be within the same key. This means that if we want to make a progression in which the root, or tonic, is in the key of C, we will not find chords that are out of this key (such as Ab or Cm).

Diatonic Chords in the key of C Major

(the 2, 3, and 6 of this progression are minor, meaning that the roman numerals should have lower case (i's))
In the picture above the following chords are shown in the key of C major:

   I                 ii                  iii                   IV                        V                   Vi               Vii diminished
tonic      supertonic      mediant       subdominant         dominant       submediant            subtonic

As stated before, a chord progression is a series of of chords, so we know that in order to create a progression we're going to have to put these chords in some sort of order. But wait, is it really that simple? Well....yes. There are no set rules as to what chords follow others in a chord progression. This leaves room for creativity within compositions so we aren't constrained to a few styles of progressions. That being said, there are guidelines for deciding what chords should follow others in a chord progression.

Typically, root relationships revolved around the distances that chords have from each other. This distance is based from the interval space between the tonic (1st) note of each triad. For example, the root relationship between the (I) and the (iii) chord in the key of C Major is a major 3rd. This is because the root of the (I) chord is (C), and the distance between it and the root of the (iii) chord, (E), is a major third.

These types of relationships form strong connections between chords. In classical music the relationship between the (V) and the (I) chord is important in the context of many cadences. A cadence is a harmonic configuration which gives the phrase of music a sense of resolution or pause. Another relationship in chord progressions that can be heard is the (IV) to (I) cadence, which is often displayed in Church Music as the "A-men" phrase at the end of a prayer.

Lets now apply this to a song that I am currently singing in my Concert Choir.


*Note: This piece is in the key of E Major*

The focus of this picture is the cadence that occurs at the end of the crescendo ("home"). As a baritone, my line goes from an (E) to a (B), which is a 4th interval. But look at the other parts. If we connect the notes that the composer spread throughout the voice parts, then we end up with a (E6) and a (B) Chord. The relationship between these chords is a 4th, but because the piece is in E major this transition is from the tonic chord (I) down to the Dominant (V) if gives the phrase a sense of continuation. Instead of simply ending the phrase and moving on to the next musical idea, this composer decides to create anticipation within the music that brings about the main focus of the piece. 

Let's now look at the opposite within the same piece. 



This is a measure from a later section of the piece in which a cadence is used to end the phrase. Here, the notes I sing in the bass line still have the 4th relationship. The two chords (A6) and (E) also share this relationship. Now if you think about the two cadences we've looked at so far, you'll notice they they both incorporate movement in 4ths. But in the first cadence a 4th is used to introduce a new phrase by going down in tonal movement from the tonic to the dominant, while the second moves down from the subdominant to the tonic. By returning to the tonic chord it brings the phrase to a sense of closure, allowing the music to shift focus or enforce another idea. 

So through these examples we see the affect of movement between the chords. Movement away from the tonic, or any chord really, can have different affects on the music depending on if they're moving up or down the diatonic scale. Through this method, ideas in the music can be expressed as transitions or closing statements, all while using the same relationships between the chords. 

Thanks for reading and if you have any questions about the concept of root relationships and movement let me know by commenting on the post below!

Sincerely, ZS 

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

Enharmonic Notes and Key Signatures

      What is a Key Signature? What are accidentals? How is it possible for a note like (C) to have more than one name?

      Let's start with the basics. We know that notes (or pitches as some might refer to them), arrange themselves onto the master staff as displayed below.



          But what most beginning instrumentalists and singers don't understand is that there is a lot of space between each note on the staff. For example, between the notes (C) and (D) is the note (C#) right? And between (A) and (B) is (Bb) right? If you play the piano, you know these notes exist because they are represented by the black keys that sit in between the white keys.  

     So what is meant by the Sharp/(#) symbol? A sharp is a type of accidental that means to play the respective note "up" one semitone (or half-step). So if we drew a sharp next to a (C) on the scale, we would now call this note (C Sharp)/(#C). 

      What about the Flat/(b) symbol? A flat is another type of accidental that means the play the respective note "down" one semitone (or half-step). So if we drew a flat next to a (E) on the scale, we would now call this note (E Flat)/(Eb) 

But wait a second, the black keys in the picture have two names! How is that possible, and how do you know which name to call each note if they have more than one? 

           ^The question above brings up a good point. The black keys have more than one name for each note, and which name to call them all depends on what note you're using as a reference point. If a pitch can be represented by different names and different accidentals, then it can be labeled as enharmonic. For example, (D#) is the same as (Eb) because the raising of (D) one semitone or the lowering of (E) one semitone results in the same pitch. Now, how you know which name to call notes depends on the key signature you're in. 

           But without worrying about when to call which notes what, let's talk about how notes can have different names. First of all, it's important to remember that enharmonic names can only be given off the primary tones (my way of saying the "white keys"). So this means you cannot have a note called (F# sharp) or (Eb Flat). These notes *can* be expressed by other notes, but not by "black keys". 

The note (G) can be expressed from the note (F) by an accidental known as a Double Sharp (x). Instead of the note being raised "one" semitone, it is now raised "two" semitones. So (Fx) is another way of saying (G). 

      The note (G) can also be expressed from the note (A) by an accidental known as a Double Flat (bb). Now, instead of the note being lowered "one" semitone, it is lowered "two" semitones. So (Abb) is another way of saying (G). In this way we now have three names for (G). Most all of the pitches on the keyboard have three names except for one, which only has two. (see if you can figure out which one). 

      Anyway, let's now move along and talk about Key Signatures so we can tie in these note names with how they are expressed in different keys. 

Key Signatures are collections of accidentals (sharps and flats) that are found in specific scales (We'll talk about scales in more detail Friday). Key signatures are used in music because they eliminate the need to write out all the individual sharps and flats that unique scales are formed by. Let's analyze a couple examples for absolute clarity on this topic;

The key signature shown to the right is F Major. Note that a flat is drawn on the (B) line on the treble clef. This means that when notes are placed on that clef they are automatically played one semitone below the standard (B). So if a note was drawn on that line, we would call that note (Bb), even though no accidentals are written directly in front of the note, because of the key signature. 




The key signature to the right is Bb Major (We will discuss identifying key signatures at the end of the post). Keep in mind that any notes placed on the (B) line will still be flattened because of the accidental in the key signature, but now we're going to add another line that follows this same method: (E). Now if a note is drawn on either the (B) or (E) line, we know to flatten that note automatically. 

Does this make sense for the flats? I'm going to move on to some key signature that have sharps in them, but if you don't have a firm grasp on this concept, go to this site: Key Signature Help

The Key Signature to the left is G Major. Notice that a sharp has a been drawn on the (F) line in the treble clef. Because this accidental has been written on this line, all notes that will be one the (F) line will be "raised" one semitone (half-step). So if a note was drawn on the (F) line, we would call it (#F). 


The Key Signature to the left is D Major. Notice that an accidental has been placed on the (C) line, in addition to the one on the (F) line. Now, if a note is placed on the (C) line, we know to "raise" it a half-step along with any notes drawn on the (F) line. 




The purpose of these examples was to demonstrate how pitch notation is affected by key signatures. Keeping key signatures in mind, it removes the need to mark accidentals next to each note that is played above or below pitch in different key signatures. This is really setting the stage for the next post on my blog which will be about Scales and Relative Key Signatures, but it's nice to have this information now so we can apply it to the basic principles of Enharmonic Notes. 

Typically, we will define enharmonic notes by the key they are played in. For example, a (F#) will be known as F Sharp in the key of D Major because it's a sharp that's written on the staff. The same goes for (C#). 

Likewise, if we wanted to know whether to call a note (Bb) or (A#), we would look at the key signature. If the key was F major, then it would be called (Bb). 

Now, as you've probably guessed, there are more key signature than just the one's I've used as examples. Here's a picture that shows all of them. 


How do we identify these key signatures? Well, the process is actually a lot easier than it looks. This is because there are some simple tricks within the accidentals that help to identify these signatures. 

For flats: Look at the second to last flat. Identify what line it's on and the key signature is the flattened note on the line (Always major). 

For Sharps: Look at the last sharp in the sequence. Raise that not up an additional half-step and you'll have your major key. 

Notice that these rules apply for every signature except for C Major and F Major (Due to the lack of accidentals or two flats) Sadly, you have to memorize these, but it's a lot better than memorizing all TWELVE.

So tying this back to what we learned earlier, Key signature's allow musicians to write music without having to specify the accidentals of each note. There is one exception to this rule, where a note is written into the score that is indicated as sharp/flat, but is played "as written", meaning it is played without any sharps or flats. This is what the "natural" symbol looks like:
  




The last thing I want to talk about in this post is how notes retain their accidental properties till the end of the measure. As we know, key signatures allow notes to be written with their accidentals "implied" by the line or space they are drawn in. But what if we have a note that is out of the key such as a double flat/sharp or natural? Does that note retain it's new properties for the rest of the piece?

The answer is no. If a key signature indicates that a note is always played flat, then it will always be played this way "unless" specified differently. At the end of the measure that the difference occurred however, the note reverts back to it's form as instructed by the key signature. 

For example, let's pretend this measure to the right is in a key which specifies the note (A) to be flat. Now, we see that after the (C#) the (A) appears again, but this time it's (A) natural. So the difference between (Ab) and (A) natural is one half-step up. At the beginning of the next measure if (A) was to be played again, it would return to it's flattened form.





I'll post a couple examples of this later this week to provide clarity, but if you have any questions that I didn't address in the post feel free to comment below!

Sincerely, ZS

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Interval Recognition (For those of you that despise Solfège)

    What are intervals?
          Well, to make a long video about relatable music theory a short sentence that describes their physical essence, a interval is a measure of the specific distance between two pitches. Now some of you might be crying out "What's it measured by? Inches? Centimeters?", but you're thinking about music like it's a form of math, and while it's technically possible to measure notes by the frequency and wavelength of their tone, we're going to stay focused on the bar staff.
          If you've ever sung in a choir or played an instrument before, you'll recognize that a standard Master Staff looks like this;

          As stated before, an interval is the measure between pitches. Each note (A whole note in this case) displayed on the staff above represents a audible pitch that we can distinguish on any variety of instruments. Now in this instance the notes are arranged in a scale (any set of musical notes arranged by fundamental frequency or pitch) and the intervals are very small. This is because the distance between the notes in a scale are small, but still distinguishable. Now as these notes begin to spread out along the staff, or be arranged so that they aren't separated by whole steps, we begin to hear and see intervals. 

         Notice that if intervals are labeled by the amount of "Lines & Spaces" that they span across. For example (assuming you can read a standard Treble Clef), the interval between middle C and F is a 4th because there are 4 lines and spaces involved in the interval (Thats two lines, and two spaces if you want to be picky).

        So using this method of basic interval recognition, we can discern that specific intervals will have a constant sound or "feeling" to them when played on an instrument or sung.

       This is the overall point of this post, because while some "good" choir students may be content in learning that the second of a major scale is always "Rae" and the seventh is always "Te", I find it's more helpful to recognize intervals in classical music by using examples from songs that we all learned as children when growing up.


But just in case you're curious about Solfège, this is how it line's up with music notation. ----------->
(For the basic gist of it, ignore the sharps and flats)


       Let me enlighten you with an example. We all know how the song "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star" goes, but can you hear the major 5th in the song? It's when you sing "Twinkle Twinkle" in the song. That's an interval, and a great example of a perfect 5th (P5). Another example is in the wedding song "Here Comes the Bride". When you sing "Here-comes", you're singing a Perfect 4th (P4).

To make this simple, let's just plot everything out;


  • Minor 2nd: "Jaws"
  • Major 2nd "Happy Birthday"
  • Minor 3rd: "Brahms Lullaby"
  • Major 3rd: "Kum Ba Yah"
  • Perfect 4th: "Here Comes the Bride"
  • Perfect 5th: "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star"
  • Minor 6th: "The Entertainer"
  • Major 6th: "My Bonnie Lies over the Ocean"
  • Minor 7th: "There's a Place for Us" (West Side Story)
  • Major 7th: "Superman Theme"
  • Perfect 8th: "Somewhere over the Rainbow" 

Here's a link to a website that has a bunch of songs that help you memorize basic interval patterns;
VUC Music Theory     (It also explains what the symbols mean: "P"5 or "M"3)

        Now this post deals more with Ear Training than anything else, but it's still important to understand the critical theory behind it. By using this method, of recognizing that intervals are everywhere in modern music, it'll be a lot easier to sight read complex pieces of music and get the intervals right the first time. This skill is also invaluable in choral singing when one voice part has to find their next note based of one they sang a couple measure ago or one given by another voice part.

        Oh, and if you want to learn more about Solfège and the "classy" way to learn how to sing on pitch, check out this website;  Sol What? Some Thoughts on Solfège . This guy has some great reasons why solfège should still be used, so if you want clarification about it, go to him!

I hope this was helpful, I use this process all the time in the many choirs I'm involved in, so I hope you can put this to good use too!

Sincerely, ZS

*Also, I'll be allowing comments from now on. Please keep them appropriate and relevant to the topic at hand, and if you have an requests for what I should post next list them below! Thanks!*